Resources · Umpire selection
The two appraisers compare positions and close what they can. Whatever's left goes to a third person, and that person decides it. So the choice of who takes that chair shapes the disputed portion of the loss before a single item gets argued, and it's the step almost nobody slows down for.
The umpire's authority is narrow and complete at once. Everything the two appraisers already settled stays settled, and the umpire doesn't reopen it. But on the items still open, one person decides, and that decision ends the argument.
The practical effect is simple enough. Whatever gap remains when the appraisers finish comparing, the umpire resolves, and the person chosen brings a particular set of buildings and a particular set of judgments to that work. Two careful candidates can read the same two estimates and land in different places. That can happen without either one being careless. People see what they've handled before.
So by the time a name is agreed, the outcome of the disputed portion is already substantially shaped. Shaped, not decided. The distinction is real, and it's thinner than most people assume.
This is an informational overview of a step found in most Ohio property policies. It isn't legal advice, and your policy's exact language controls. Ironclad Assessment Group serves as a neutral appraiser and umpire. We're not a public adjuster, and we don't adjust, negotiate, interpret your policy, or settle claims.
Ordinarily the two appraisers work it out between themselves. One appraiser offers a name, the other checks it and either accepts it or puts up an alternative, and the exchange continues until a name both of them can accept is on the table. It's usually a short conversation. Both of them know they'll be presenting to whoever ends up in that chair.
Many appraisal clauses put a window around the steps that come before this one. Twenty days is a figure that turns up often for naming each side's appraiser after a written demand, though common isn't universal, and your policy's exact language controls the timing on your file. The clause is short. It's worth reading before the question comes up rather than after.
When the two genuinely can't agree on anyone, many policies provide a fallback so the matter doesn't stall. The common one is an application to a court in the county where the property sits, asking for an appointment. What that involves in practice depends on your policy's wording and on local court practice, and it's a reasonable question to put to a policyholder-side insurance attorney. Worth knowing the fallback exists before it's needed. Once it's triggered, the choice has largely moved out of the appraisers' hands.
Policies ask the appraisers and the umpire alike to be competent, but the two jobs spend that competence differently. An appraiser builds a valuation from a building. The umpire reads two valuations that are already built, holds them against the same building, and decides which lines describe the work that's actually there.
That's a specific skill, and it's specific to the structure. Deciding between two roof positions means knowing what tear-off and reinstall really take on a laminated shingle, and what decking replacement runs when the old fastener pattern won't hold. On a water file it means following how far the moisture traveled into the subfloor and into the cabinet runs before deciding whose number describes it. A commercial building asks for something else again.
Somebody who has never worked the building type in dispute can be careful and honest and still land wrong, because the disagreement in front of them is technical before it's anything else. Your appraiser is the one having the selection conversation. The building type belongs in it.
Here the word disinterested is doing real work, so it's worth being concrete. Policies ask for an umpire who is impartial, or disinterested, depending on which term your clause uses. Either way it points at the same set of facts.
No financial stake in what the number turns out to be. No prior involvement in this loss, which covers having inspected it, estimated it, or advised either side about it. And no relationship with either party that a reasonable person would call a thumb on the scale.
Pay is where this gets tested first. An umpire compensated as a share of the award has an interest in the size of the award, which is the one interest the role cannot carry. An award decided on those terms invites a challenge later, and the challenge writes itself. A fee agreed in advance, with no tie to the figure, leaves the decision standing on what's in it.
Anyone with real experience in this work has a history, and in a field this narrow the history runs on both sides. A candidate who has been appointed by carriers before isn't compromised by that fact. Neither is one who has been appointed by policyholders. Experience comes from somewhere.
What matters is that the history gets disclosed and that both appraisers look at its shape. A candidate whose appointments have come almost entirely from carriers raises a question. So does a candidate whose appointments have come almost entirely from policyholders. It's the same question, and it carries the same weight in both directions. Asking it accuses nobody of anything.
Disclosure done well is unremarkable. The candidate says who they've worked with and on which side, and states plainly whether they've had any involvement with this loss or these parties. The fee arrangement goes on the table at the same time. Both appraisers see all of it, and if neither is troubled, the file moves.
A candidate who declines to answer has answered.
The work narrows immediately. The umpire reviews both appraisers' positions on the items still open and decides those items. Everything already agreed stays exactly where the appraisers left it. Under most policy language, an award signed by any two of the three panel members sets the amount of loss. That's the two appraisers, or one appraiser and the umpire. It's also what lets the process finish when one appraiser holds out. The role itself is covered on its own page.
One boundary belongs here plainly. An appraisal panel decides the amount of a covered loss and nothing else. It doesn't decide whether the loss is covered, and no umpire, however experienced, has the authority to.
Ironclad Assessment Group takes umpire appointments on property files in Columbus and across central Ohio, and can serve as a party-appointed appraiser, never both roles on the same matter. Our fee is set in writing before the engagement begins and never depends on the size of the award. The full picture of what we do as appraiser and umpire is on the services page.
Many policies provide a fallback rather than letting the file stall, and the common one is an application to a court in the county where the property sits, asking for an appointment. What that involves depends on your policy's wording and on local practice. Read the clause first, since it's usually a sentence or two and it tells you which path yours takes.
Not directly, under most clauses. The two appraisers select the umpire between them, so your input runs through the appraiser you appointed. That's one reason to ask a prospective appraiser how they handle that conversation before you engage them.
Not by itself. Anyone with real experience in this work has a history, and in a field this narrow it runs on both sides. What matters is that it's disclosed and that the pattern isn't so one-sided that the candidate reads as a house appraiser for one party. The same question applies to a candidate whose appointments have come almost entirely from policyholders.
Go deeper
Central Ohio
We serve Columbus, Dublin, Powell, and communities across central Ohio, and surrounding areas on request. Write to us with where your claim stands and we'll tell you plainly whether it's a fit for what we do.
Request an Engagement